|
INTERNATIONAL
LEAGUE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS
BELARUS
UPDATE
Edited by Victor Cole
Vol. 5, No. 43
October 2002
***SPECIAL
APPEAL***
This
year has been one of enormous repression and suffering
in Belarus for brave activists attempting to defend
the sovereignty and freedom of their homeland and struggling
to protect the rights of the victims of the Lukashenko
regime. Journalists, lawyers, clergy, and NGO activists
have variously been subjected to threats, detentions,
beatings, and even sentencing to corrective labor--a
stark indication of the new worsening of state persecution
this year. At the same time, even as the internal situation
has deteriorated, the external attention to Belarus
has lessened considerably as the international community
has focused on Central Asia, Afghanistan, and the Middle
East, and some main donors have been compelled to reduce
assistance.
Each
year at American Thanksgiving time in November, we make
a special year-end appeal for contributions to the League
to assist our work. At this time we would like to appeal
to all our Belarus Update readers who are concerned
about democracy and human rights in Belarus to make
a special contribution to the League's Emergency Response
Program and directly assist individuals in need in Belarus.
This year, due to the great amount of harassment people
face, we have many more cases than in the past. We often
receive requests for help from Belarus which are hard
for the major foundations to cover in their regular
grants programs, i.e. individual humanitarian relief,
coverage of legal fees or court-ordered fines, temporary
income maintenance for persons dismissed from employment,
replacement of police-confiscated equipment, etc. That's
why we must turn to you as concerned individuals to
help us meet this need. As always, any emergency-response
contributions donated to the League for this purpose
will be sent directly and as quickly as possible to
activists in need in Belarus, without any diversion
of your contribution for overhead or administration.
Readers
in the U.S. may send checks made out to "International
League for Human Rights" (a non-profit organization
with charitable status under 501-c-3) and marked "Belarus"
to: ILHR, 823 UN Plaza, Suite 717, New York, NY 10017.
You will receive an acknowledgement letter noting your
tax-exempt contribution for use in your IRS return.
Readers outside the U.S. may also contribute by sending
a bank transfer to the League. Please contact me at
cfitz@ilhr.org for the transfer information.
We
hope we can count on you to help us help others in Belarus.
Catherine
A. Fitzpatrick
CIS Program Director
IN
THIS ISSUE:
-
Regime Is To Shut Down OSCE Mission
-
U.S. Says Belarus Shows Lack Of Respect For OSCE
- EU Concerned About Human Rights Situation In Belarus
- Belarusian Authorities Detain, Deport Russian Politician
- Belarus Is Ranked 124th Out Of 139 For Press Freedom
Violations
- RFE/RL's Belarusian Service Editor Released From German
Jail
- Strike Leader Goes To Prison For Staging Unauthorized
Rally
- Court Upholds Refusal To Register Hindu Communities
- Belarus, Ukraine Seek More Cooperation With Iraq
-
HUMAN RIGHTS AND OPPOSITION NEWS-
REGIME
IS TO SHUT DOWN OSCE MISSION
The
Belarusian authorities announced on October 21 they
will close down the OSCE mission in Minsk, the security
body which has repeatedly criticized the lack of political,
media and civil freedoms in the country. "The OSCE
mission in its current form will not work in Belarus,"
said Pavel Latushko, spokesman for the Ministry of Foreign.
Latushko explained that the Belarusian government was
demanding "mutual trust and respect of the opinion
of the host state on the basis of clear and understandable
goals and tasks." Latushko said that the Belarusian
authorities offered last year to begin consultations
on reformulating the mission's mandate, but the OSCE
refused.
A
Belarusian representative at the OSCE's headquarters
in Vienna has also "formally requested the closure
of the OSCE mission" in Minsk, stating this was
a requirement for any talks on a future presence in
Belarus, said Alexander Nietzsche, OSCE spokesman.
After
expelling two top OSCE officials in April 2002 and refusing
to extend the visa of its acting head in September 2002,
the Lukashenko regime is now set to withdraw the diplomatic
credentials of the last remaining employee. The sole
current representative of the pan-European security
body in Minsk, Alina Josan, is a citizen of the former
Soviet republic of Moldova and therefore does not need
a visa to work in Belarus. But, most likely, the regime
will not renew her diplomatic accreditation when it
expires on October 29, she said.
The
OSCE mission refused to comment on Latushko's statement
and a spokesman for the group's headquarters in Vienna
said the office had not been informed of the decision
yet. The 15 EU foreign ministers, meeting this week
in Luxembourg, said they were "seriously concerned"
by the situation in Belarus, which after the planned
eastward expansion of the European bloc in 2004, will
be on its borders. (Belapan, RFE/RL, Charter 97, October
21-23)
U.S.
SAYS BELARUS SHOWS LACK OF RESPECT FOR OSCE
Belarus
has demonstrated an "overriding lack of respect"
for the OSCE by its deliberate
efforts to bring the OSCE AMG's activities to a halt
"through the expulsion of international mission
members," and its unwillingness to "substantively"
negotiate about
this issue, Douglas Davidson, deputy chief of the U.S.
Mission to the OSCE, told the OSCE Permanent Council
in Vienna on October 17.
Following
are excerpts from his statement:
"At
the Permanent Council meeting on October 3, Amb. Gaisenok
made the point that delicate negotiations over an OSCE
presence in Minsk would enjoy better prospects of success
if conducted in private. We would agree with that sentiment,
if Belarus were negotiating in earnest and good faith.
However, from the disparate positions presented by Belarus
over the last ten months and taking into account the
fact that Belarus remains unprepared to negotiate with
the Chair substantively, it is apparent that such an
approach is impossible."
"Further,
Belarus's deliberate efforts to bring the AMG's activities
to a halt through the expulsion of international mission
members contravenes the decision that this Permanent
Council adopted in 1997. This fact makes this matter
a concern to all of us within the Permanent Council
today."
"We
in the United States delegation share the view expressed
by you and the European Union's representative here
that the AMG's mandate, as laid out in the decision
we adopted in 1997, remains in effect until this Permanent
Council adopts a decision to change or amend it. Mr.
Chairman, Belarus has made frequent calls for Permanent
Council consideration of its complaints about the work
of the AMG in the past. The Permanent Council has already
heard those complaints many times, and it will no doubt
hear them again today. More to the point, however, negotiations
over the future of the AMG provide Belarus an avenue
to address those concerns and move forward;
yet, it has rejected every effort to do so."
"Mr.
Chairman, there is not a host State within this Permanent
Council that has not had, at one time or another, concerns
about the work of the OSCE field presence on its territory
With
regard to Belarus, we reject the notion that this matter
is about respect for the views of a host State. Instead,
it is about the overriding lack of respect of one participating
State for the principles of this organization and the
decisions of this Permanent Council."
"In
closing, a decision by Belarus to expel the last member
of the AMG and block negotiations will bring the AMG's
activities to an effective halt. Such conduct in contravention
of OSCE principles and decisions undermines the integrity
of this organization. It is unacceptable. As such, this
issue would need to be addressed by Ministers in Porto.
Furthermore, in view of the extraordinary precedent
this would set, we
believe that it will be necessary to consider appropriate
concrete measures to adopt in response on both a bilateral
and multilateral basis."
A
week later, on October 24, Douglas Davidson once again
expressed concern about the "accelerating deterioration
of respect for human rights in Belarus" and the
government's failure to meet its commitments to the
OSCE. He told the Permanent Council in Vienna that Belarus
"has made it abundantly clear that it has no intention
of honoring" its commitment to permit the OSCE
AMG to function in that country, or to seriously negotiate
about this issue.
Following
is a transcript of his statement:
"We
share the concern expressed by the EU about the recent
beating of opposition figures in Belarus. Unfortunately,
these beatings are only symptomatic of an accelerating
deterioration of respect for human rights in Belarus."
"Since
September 2001, alone, Belarus has been cited by the
OSCE's Office for Democratic Institutions and Human
Rights, the OSCE's Representative for Freedom of the
Media, the OSCE's Chairman-in-Office, the OSCE Parliamentary
Assembly, the Council of Europe, the European Union,
a wide array of NGOs -- both domestic and
international -- and many delegations to this Permanent
Council for its failure to meet OSCE commitments on
elections, freedom of _expression and media, freedom
of association, freedom of religion, and respect for
civil society. Meanwhile, as noted by the EU, the disappearances
of political opponents of the current government remain
unresolved."
"Mr.
Chairman, the decision this Permanent Council adopted
in 1997, creating the AMG [Advisory and Monitoring Group],
produced an instrument to address these types of concerns.
Belarus has made it abundantly clear that it has no
intention of honoring the commitment that decision represents,
nor of negotiating a new decision that would bring it
into compliance and produce a new instrument to address
these concerns. Therefore, we see no utility in addressing
this matter to Belarus today, but rather to the Chairman-in-Office
of this organization and to this Permanent Council."
"Belarus
has clearly exercised its ability to prevent the AMG
from functioning properly in the field. However, Ambassador
Gaisenok has also agreed, correctly, that the AMG, de
jure, still exists. We ask, then, why not let it function?"
"Part
of its mandate is to monitor developments. Since April,
at least one, and in June, as many as three seconded
AMG members have resided in Vienna, in addition to Ambassador
Heyken, the Chair's Special Envoy on Belarus. Yet, since
June, the AMG has not produced a single report, written
or oral, for this Permanent Council. We request that
the Chair task the AMG with reporting to the PC on a
regular basis on developments in Belarus. In that connection,
the Chair should exercise its prerogative to appoint
a Special Representative who could make these regular
reports to the Permanent Council."
"Mr.
Chairman, our ability to confront and resolve this impasse
is central to the integrity of this organization. As
such, absent progress, it will need to be on the agenda
in Porto [Portugal]. But we agree with the Russian Federation
that it behooves all of us to resolve this matter beforehand.
Since Belarus is not in a position to negotiate a resolution
in Vienna, we again urge you to send a senior delegation
to Minsk."
"We
also call for all participating States to consider the
OSCE procedures and mechanisms at our disposal to address
this matter appropriately. Some of these have not been
utilized since the early nineties in similarly dire
circumstances, but they remain relevant."
"Clearly,
States reserve the right to address concerns bilaterally
or in fora outside Vienna. However, invoking OSCE procedures
and mechanisms has the added advantage of demonstrating
to the international community that this organization
has the wherewithal to address its own problems. These
procedures and mechanisms need to be exhaustively considered
as we move toward the Porto Ministerial." (USIA,
October 18 - 24)
EU
CONCERNED ABOUT HUMAN RIGHTS SITUATION IN BELARUS
The
European Union expressed on October 21 deep concern
"at the lack of
progress in democratic reform and the growing deterioration
of individual freedoms and rights of _expression in
Belarus," and issued a declaration on Belarus'
relationship with the OSCE. The declaration says the
OSCE AMG in Minsk plays a vital role "in assisting
the Government of Belarus and civil society in promoting
democratic institutions and in complying with other
OSCE commitments."
Following
is the declaration:
1.
At its meeting on 21 October 2002, the Council of the
EU expressed serious concern about the situation of
democracy and human rights in Belarus and adopted the
following declaration:
2.
Recalling the conclusions of the Council of 15 September
1997, the EU reiterates once again the hope that Belarus
would take place among European democratic countries,
not least since Belarus will become a direct neighbor
after EU enlargement.
3.
The EU emphasizes the importance for all European States
of respect for human rights and freedoms, as guaranteed
in the UN Charter and embodied in the Helsinki Final
Act. In Belarus, the OSCE Advisory and Monitoring Group
(AMG) in Minsk has a vital role to play in assisting
the Government of Belarus and civil society in promoting
democratic
institutions and in complying with other OSCE commitments
as well as monitor and report on this process.
4.
The EU has consistently supported the Portuguese Chair
of OSCE in its efforts to solve the impasse regarding
the AMG in Minsk. It believes that the Chair has already
shown great flexibility in trying to find a solution
to the problems that have arisen as a result of
Belarus' treatment of the AMG. The EU cannot accept
the Belarusian position that the AMG should be formally
closed before negotiations on a new OSCE presence can
begin. It supports the Chair's view that the AMG's 1997-mandate
remains in force, in full, until there is consensus
in the OSCE Permanent Council to amend or replace it.
5.
The EU has noted the commitment made in September by
FM Khvostov to enter into negotiations with a view to
the continued operation of the AMG. The EU urges the
Belarusian authorities to enter into immediate, meaningful
and result-oriented negotiations. In addition, the EU
requests the Government of Belarus immediately to extend
the accreditation of the remaining member of the diplomatic
staff of the
Mission beyond 29 October 2002, or alternatively to
extend accreditation to a replacement, with a view to
avoiding disruption to the activities of the Mission.
6.
If the Government of Belarus fails to indicate its agreement
to this request by 29 October, this will seriously affect
not only relations with the OSCE, but also the development
of relations between Belarus and the EU. The EU remains
deeply concerned at the lack of progress in democratic
reform and the growing deterioration of individual freedoms
and rights of _expression in Belarus; should, in addition,
the AMG be unable to continue its work, the EU will
be obliged to review its relations with Belarus and
envisage further specific measures. If, on the other
hand, an adequate solution allowing for the effective
and lasting operation of the AMG was found, the EU could
take this as a new starting point for discussions on
the improvement of its relations with Belarus.
7.
The EU expresses readiness to continue to work closely
with the Chair to ensure that the OSCE can contribute
to the development of genuine democracy and full respect
for human rights in Belarus, including through an active
OSCE presence.
8.
The Council of the EU will consider the evolution of
the situation in Belarus at its meeting on 18/19 November
2002. http://usinfo.state.gov/products/washfile/rights.shtml
BELARUSIAN
AUTHORITIES DETAIN, DEPORT RUSSIAN POLITICIAN
Boris
Nemtsov, a leader of the liberal Union of Right Forces,
was detained by two officers of the Belarusian security
services when he stepped off a plane in Minsk on October
23 to attend a conference on the Russia-Belarus Union
and ordered to immediately depart back for Moscow, party
spokeswoman Elena Dikun told journalists. Dikun said
that as Nemtsov was being taken away, he told her that
the officers had planted a folder with phony party documents
and U.S. dollars on them. "This is a pure setup,"
Dikun said.
Nemtsov
was accompanied by Irina Khakamada, another leader of
the party. Although Khakamada was not detained, she
chose to stay with Nemtsov and leave the country with
him, according to media reports. The politicians were
escorted from the airport building to a plane for BelAvia's
regular Minsk-Moscow flight. Journalists gathered there
shouted to Nemtsov and Khakamada to speak to the press.
The two tried to walk to the reporters but their escorts
did not allow them to speak to the journalists. The
plane took off minutes later.
In
remarks by telephone to ORT, Russia's state-controlled
television station, Nemtsov said that he believes his
deportation was ordered by Lukashenko. "Lukashenko
is against the union and is showing this with his behavior.
I hope our head of state will take note of this,"
Nemtsov told ORT. "Doing business with this person
is very dangerous." [Earlier this year, Russian
President Vladimir Putin suggested to Lukashenko that
Belarus simply be incorporated into its much larger
neighbor - a proposal that infuriated the Belarusian
authoritarian leader. Many analysts saw Putin's statement
as a ploy to get Lukashenko, previously the main proponent
of the union, to drop the idea altogether.-Ed.]
Fyodor
Kotov, Belarusian KGB spokesman, was present at the
airport at the time Nemtsov was being deported but refused
to comment. Pavel Latushko, Foreign Ministry spokesman,
said Nemtsov was deported "because of numerous
facts of interference into the internal affairs of Belarus."
He refused to comment on the documents and money mentioned
by Dikun. However, the Interfax news agency reported
that an unidentified KGB official bragged that Nemtsov
was caught with $50,000 and "literature aimed at
destabilizing the situation in Belarus."
Boris
Malakhov, Russian Foreign Ministry spokesman, said in
a statement that reports of Nemtsov's deportation were
met "with bewilderment and deep concern" in
Moscow. "We are counting on getting an answer from
the Belarusian leadership."
Nemtsov,
a former Russian first deputy prime minister, maintains
contacts with the Belarusian opposition. Last month,
Moscow prosecutors launched a criminal investigation
into the publication of a bugged telephone conversation
between Nemtsov and a Belarusian opposition leader.
According to the transcript published by an ultranationalist
newspaper, Nemtsov said the Kremlin had grown increasingly
frustrated with Lukashenko and that he had urged the
Moscow to establish contacts with the opposition.
Ivan
Pashkevich, head of the Belarusian National Assembly's
Commission for Human Rights and Mass Media, slammed
the Nemtsov's expulsion as "a deliberate provocation
sanctioned from the top." Valery Zakharchenko,
another deputy and a leader of the pro -Lukashenko Communist
Party, believes that Nemtsov and Khakamada were "got
what they deserve for their most recent public statements
about the existence of a so-called dictatorial regime
in Belarus and the need to support opposition forces
in order to replace this regime." (Interfax, Belapan,
Itar-Tass, October 23-24)
BELARUS
IS RANKED 124TH OUT OF 139 FOR PRESS FREEDOM VIOLATIONS
The
first worldwide index of press freedom published on
October 17 by the Reporters Without Borders has some
surprises for Western democracies. The United States
was ranked below Costa Rica and Italy scored lower than
Benin. The poor ranking of the United States (17th)
is mainly because of the number of journalists arrested
or imprisoned there. Prison sentences are often prompted
by the journalists' refusal to reveal their sources
in court. Also, since the 11 September attacks, several
journalists have been arrested for crossing security
lines at some official buildings. The five countries
with least press freedom are North Korea, China, Burma,
Turkmenistan, and Bhutan.
In
the worst-ranked countries, press freedom is a dead
letter and independent newspapers do not exist. The
only voice heard is of media tightly controlled or monitored
by the government. The very few independent journalists
are constantly harassed, imprisoned or forced into exile
by the authorities. The foreign media is banned or allowed
in very small doses, always closely monitored. Belarus,
the last dictatorship in Europe, came 124th and is the
country where journalists go to prison for "insulting"
public officials.
The
index was drawn up by asking journalists, researchers
and legal experts to answer 50 questions about the whole
range of press freedom violations (such as murders or
arrests of journalists, censorship, pressure, state
monopolies in various fields, punishment of press law
offences and regulation of the media). The final list
includes 139 countries. The others were not included
for the absence of reliable information. The full text
of the report is located at http://www.rsf.fr/article.php3?id_article=4116
RFE/RL's
BELARUSIAN SERVICE EDITOR RELEASED FROM GERMAN JAIL
Natalya
Sudliankova, an editor for RFE/RL's Belarusian Service,
was detained
on October 7 at the Czech-German border on an international
criminal warrant filed by the Belarusian government.
A citizen of Belarus and a longtime political activist
opposed to the Lukashenko regime, Sudliankova fled her
country with her family in 1999 and was granted political
asylum in the Czech Republic. A Czech court in January,
2002 rejected an extradition request by the Minsk government,
finding the charges made against Sudliankova to be without
merit. Those charges were not withdrawn, however, and
her name remained on an Interpol list of wanted criminals.
Sudliankova was arrested during her first attempt to
travel outside of the Czech Republic since being granted
political asylum. On October 18, Natalya was set free
form a prison in Bamberg, Germany.
"We
are glad that Natalya has finally been released and
can now be reunited with her family in Prague,"
RFE/RL President Thomas Dine said in a statement, adding
that "Clearly, the German authorities have recognized
the baseless nature of the charges made against Natalya,
and are no longer willing to play a role in the settling
of political scores by the undemocratic regime of Belarusian
leader Alexander Lukashenko." (RFE/RL, October
21)
STRIKE
LEADER GOES TO PRISON FOR STAGING UNAUTHORIZED RALLY
Valery
Levonevsky, head of the Belarusian Trade Union of Small-Business
Owners, was
charged with violation of Art 167, par. 1 ("participation
in mass actions violating public order") of the
Belarusian Administrative Offenses Code and sentenced
to 15 days' imprisonment. He was arrested in Grodno
on October 11 for holding an authorized rally in protest
against recent tax increases and insurance fees for
small business owners. (Belapan, October 24)
-RELIGIOUS
FREEDOM IN BELARUS-
COURT
UPHOLDS REFUSAL TO REGISTER HINDU COMMUNITIES
Judge
Vera Daneyko-Grabovskaya of the Centralny District Court
of Minsk dismissed on October 18 an appeal launched
by the unregistered Association of Belarusian Communities
for Krishna Consciousness against the State Committee
for Religious and Ethnic Affairs. The Krishna followers
were trying to reverse the Committee's decision not
to register the Association. On July 4, the same court
ruled that the Committee has one month to make a decision
regarding the Association's registration. The Committee
decided to deny the registration on the grounds that
it does not have a legal address. Following the refusal,
the association filed another law suit providing the
proof of the legal address and other documents required
for the state registration, but was denied it. (Belapan,
October 18)
-BROTHER
SLAVS-
BELARUS,
UKRAINE SEEK MORE COOPERATION WITH IRAQ
Alexander
Lukashenko reiterated on October 22 his intention to
boost cooperation with Iraq. During a meeting with Nikolai
Ivanchenko, deputy head of the presidential administration
and co-chairman of the Belarusian-Iraqi Commission For
Trade And Economic Cooperation, the Belarusian leader
said he would welcome better ties with
Iraq
and gave a number of instructions aimed at improving
ties with Iraq within the framework of the UN oil-for-food
program.
Although
the Belarusian leader claims to respect UN embargoes,
he does not feel bound by unilateral export bans imposed
by the US on Iran, North Korea and Libya. On his part,
in the past three years Baghdad has increasingly looked
to Belarus and Ukraine for weapons, the Financial Times
reported on October 21. The evidence against Belarus
and Ukraine is mounting: alleged secret recordings made
in the office of Leonid Kuchma, Ukrainian president;
intercepted shipments; arrest of suspected arms traders;
and western intelligence reports, the newspaper continued.
"If anywhere in the former Soviet Union were supplying
weapons to dubious countries, Belarus would be my candidate,"
says Julian Cooper, deputy director of the Russian and
East European studies center at Birmingham university.
There
is clear evidence of Baghdad's interest in securing
equipment from Ukraine and Belarus, the Financial Times
wrote:
"The
alleged sale of the Kolchuga radar system in 2000 is
mentioned in recordings made secretly in Kuchma's office
and smuggled to the west by Mikola Melnichenko, his
former bodyguard. The US says it has authenticated the
recording."
"In
a separate recording, Kuchma can apparently be heard
talking to Yuri Alexeev, director of Yuzhmash, Ukraine's
largest rocket-maker, which was for a time run by Kuchma
before he entered politics. In a barely audible exchange,
the two men are heard referring to Iraq, Iran and rockets.
Mr Kuchma and Mr Alexeev deny having the conversation."
"In
August police arrested a Russian-Canadian man in Germany
and two other people in the Czech Republic suspected
of organizing illegal arms exports from Russia, Ukraine
and Bulgaria to the Middle East. According to Czech
prosecutors, shipments to Iraq included Russian-made
Mi-8 and Mi-17 combat helicopters, Kalashnikov rifles,
anti-tank grenades and mobile anti-aircraft missile
systems."
"In
February, Steven Pifer, a senior US State Department
official on a visit to Minsk, accused Belarus of involvement
in arms transfers and military training for so-called
rogue states, including the reported training of Iraqis
in operating S-300 missile defense systems. Mr Pifer
repeated the general claims on a second visit in August."
"Tony
Blair accused Belarus of supplying arms to Iraq in his
recent report on Iraqi military capabilities. His evidence
included a 1998 report from United Nations inspectors
in Iraq who found Belarus-made equipment in an artillery
factory."
"In
addition to these alleged clandestine activities, Iraq
has been strengthening its public links with both Ukraine
and Belarus. Baghdad this summer posted as ambassador
in Kiev Mozhar al-Duri, a former diplomat in Moscow
said by Russian officials to be close to Saddam Hussein.
There have been frequent visits by Iraqi officials to
Minsk, including two trips since July by Tawwab Huwaysh,
the deputy prime minister and military industry minister.
These initiatives are reciprocated. Ukraine has announced
plans for a trade mission in Baghdad. Belarus has signed
economic co-operation agreements."
"On
October 24, Lukashenko congratulated Saddam Hussein
on the strong support he received at the national referendum
which, according to the Belarusian leader, "vividly
demonstrated the Iraqi people's striving for independence
in making decision on their own fate," reported
Belapan. Lukashenko reiterated his interest in further
cooperation between the two countries." (The Financial
Times, Belapan, October 21- 25)
************************************************************************
The
Belarus Update is a weekly news bulletin of the Belarus
Human Rights Support Project of the International League
for Human Rights (www.ilhr.org) The League, now in its
61st year, is New York-based human rights NGO in consultative
status with the United Nations ECOSOC. Visit our website
for back issues, analysis, and links to news sites and
NGOs in Belarus: www.belarusupdate.org For queries on
how to subscribe or unsubscribe or other information,
contact belarus@ilhr.org
The
Belarus project was established to support Belarusian
citizens in making their case for the protection of
civil society before the international community regarding
Alexander Lukashenko's wholesale assault on human rights
and the rule of law in Belarus.
************************************************************************
Back
|